At the same time, one has to ask themselves whether it’s even appropriate to aestheticize such human-rights related issues: the more Instagram infographics one sees, the more neutral they start to feel about the content because it all looks the same. On social media, the message becomes secondary when faced against the medium. So much of today’s graphic design is based on user experience which prevents us from reasoning and creating a narration for ourselves, limiting us to the passive role of a spectator. Or in other cases, a re-poster.
If engagement is what today’s businesses thrive on, it’s easy to understand why corporate culture has been leaning so much onto their potential clients by creating an image of itself that’s as relatable as possible.
We’re just like you. Just a little better. Just a little more powerful.
Corporates are now preaching to us about social issues and politics while hiding the fact that the ideas they’re selling aren’t anything else but mere dupes of what the real problem is.
Every year during the month of June companies start sporting the rainbow flag all over social media and sell LGBTQ merchandise, capitalizing off the support their consumers want to give to the community. But where does that money actually go? The rise of awareness in the issue won’t lead to anything unless the companies involved adequately take action, like making the workplace more inclusive and give more support to the economically-vulnerable members of the community. With commercialization of Pride Month, the political roots of the event are dampened and the only ones who can celebrate are those who haven’t been marginalized by systemic discrimination.
Being able to work on aesthetic alone is a tactic afforded only to those already in power as it allows them sway everyone away from their lack of actual content. When ideas turn into expendable commodities, they are easily absorbed and adapted into the corporate world only to be sold to consumers as a novelty that fits into current trends, which encourages consuming ideas instead of acting upon them.
How many times have you come across the sustainable section in a fast-fashion store? The juxtaposition between these two already sounds like a joke.
Corporations are pledging to reduce their carbon footprints, but they aren’t making any effort in doing so. Instead, they’ve thrown that responsibility onto their consumers who are guilt-tripped into buying sustainable clothing, organic produce, eco cars. However, the only difference between these products and the normal ones can be found in their price, whereas the production conditions and the environmental impact they have has stayed just as unsustainable.
Companies come up with solutions to an issue only to create a bigger one to replace it with. They gain social capital with effective PR and marketing strategies by projecting themselves as socially aware, so they are no longer responsible for further action.
The liability in saving the planet and in being a dutiful citizen is put on normal people who are made to believe that using bamboo toothbrushes and wearing sustainable clothing is enough. This sustainable consumerism is the sugar pill companies, whose only goal is a progressive rise in ending revenue, are giving us to be at peace with our guilty conscience.