However, this statistic is a rather poor approximation. Though not everyone crosses the road when they see a black cat or believe in ‘Friday the 13th’, almost everyone attributes supernatural forces to common day-to-day objects. For instance, people characterize certain pens as ‘lucky’ or carry around jewelry that supposedly offers protection.
The definition of the word itself does not provide a sufficient explanation for the concept, as we often act in irrational ways whilst still claiming to not believe in metaphysical forces. We overestimate our rationality and underestimate the control system of our beliefs.
There may, however, exist a pinch of rationality in our irrational convictions. Though superstitions can result in poor decision making, they can also foster the positive headspace necessary for achieving desired outcomes. Sport perfectly exemplifies this phenomenon, as an overwhelming majority of athletes engage in some form of superstitious behavior to bolster self-confidence. Serena Williams, for instance, wears the same pair of lucky socks during her tournaments, and NFL star Brian Urlacher indulges in chocolate chip cookies before each match. As these practices are believed to alleviate tension and provide a sense of control over extenuating circumstances (even if false), they can ultimately lead to improved performance.
It may be that science and superstition are strangely interrelated. Superstitions may be portrayed as personal fictitious beliefs, whilst science, representing the accepted truth of our time, may be regarded as a reliable way of making the extraordinary possible. Superstitions, however, exist independently of science, and are enduring self-contained beliefs, which may then act as supplements to our science-ridden reality.
One might have predicted the extinction of superstition to accompany the rise of science, as most phenomena can now be factually explained. In antiquity, poor weather, lighting, and thunder, were attributed to angry gods. Today we reject this notion and look for explanations in astrophysics and meteorology.
Arguably the most fundamental confluence between science and superstition is our psychological need to explain all observable phenomena. Our constant desire to seek patterns and causal relationships between events, even if there are none, illustrates the development and prevalence of superstition alongside science.
Thus, science exists to provide us with the complete truth, whether it be positive or negative, while superstitions can furnish us with supplementary insight and psychological comfort to understand and embrace them. Indeed, being irrational may not be so irrational after all.