Having sketched out existentialism, I will further illustrate it by referencing two of my favourite works of literature that can be classified as such. I’m sure each one of you knows “The Stranger” by Albert Camus, however even if most of the author’s works adhere to absurdism, this novel is exemplary of the ambience of existentialism. The plot follows a man facing a world characterised by reckless alienation and spiritual exhaustion, which he must navigate to maintain the conviction of his meaning of life. Meursault’s inner world that the reader is privy to threatens the hypocrisy of the rest of society, as even in dire situations, he remains unapologetically himself. The main character isn’t particularly likeable as he moves through life quasi-irrationally with zero empathy or even ambition. However, he highlights an important lesson, that society expects us to adapt to the rules it creates and most of us end up doing so, pushed by the need to fit into the mass-made mould. Having sacrificed our wants and needs to satisfy everyone around us, ninety percent of the population realises their mistake on their deathbed (if at all) when they finally ask themselves the magic question “why and who did I live my life for?” The literary analysis of “The Stranger” can be a book of its own, however, it perfectly captures the struggle and feeling of dread associated with existentialism as we come to terms that we are sole in this world and devoid of a predefined meaning. We have no choice but to go and find one, otherwise it will be found for us.
Henrik Ibsen’s play “A Doll’s House” reaches an analogous conclusion. The play follows a woman, wife, and mother called Nora in 1800s Norway who, akin to her female counterparts in that period, maintains the perfect picture of her familial duties as was expected. After a grievous incident and a risky lie her perfect image threatens to fall apart. The play is unique in being one of the first to give people - women especially - the chance for self-determination in a world where that was frowned upon. However, in relation to our topic it provides a depiction of a person first losing their meaning of life and their consequent descent into a search for a new one. It highlights the paramount importance of finding meaning, even if it means enduring the criticism of society, and potentially that of the reader themself.
If I managed to captivate your curiosity, here is a list of some more book recommendations that explore existentialism: “Man’s Search for Meaning” Viktor Frankl, “Either/Or” by Søren Kierkegaard, “Being and Nothingness” and “No Exit” by Jean-Paul Charles Sartre, “Crime and Punishment” and “The Brothers Karamazov” by Fyodor Dostoevskiy, “Thus Spoke Zarathustra” by Frederich Nietzsche.